Table of Contents
Top secretInternationalIndiaAfricaThe urgency of implementing reforms of the US government’s security classification process has been underscored in the wake of the recent “Pentagon Leaks,” as well as alleged misuse of classified documents by the Joe Biden and, before that, Donald Trump administrations.A more “sensible” classification of US government records as secret or top secret, and boosted oversight on handling of such information is being pushed to ostensibly rule out a repetition of embarrassments like the recent so-called “Pentagon Leaks.”The key terms being used in connection with the proposed legislation are “overclassification” and “technological modernization.” A bipartisan group of lawmakers stated that there has been a growing clamor for a classified intelligence reform, but it was only when the “ball was dropped,” so to say, as in the case of the recent Pentagon leaks, that the process might finally get off the ground. What exactly is being proposed in line with this reform?Two bills have been proposed by Sens. Mark Warner (D-Va.), John Cornyn (R-Texas), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) and Jerry Moran (R-Kan.) as part of this overhaul: the Classification Reform Act and the Sensible Classification Act. "Whether it got in-total attached or whether we have pieces of this that went into the [National Defense Authorization Act] or the Intelligence Authorization Act, we’re actively working that," Warner, the head of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, said in a Thursday briefing, adding he hoped for some breakthroughs already during this legislative session.
Overclassification
The United States government has so many records that are classified that a vast number of people require security clearances, warned the senators. They also referenced the military as purporting that this was one of the obstacles to “working smoothly with our allies around the world.” The bar needs to be raised on what information would be classified secret and top secret, with these labels reserved only for information that truly needs to be protected, John Cornyn underscored.While federal agencies currently often classify mundane documents “by default,” the Classification Reform Act would leave it up to the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) to determine classification and declassification of documents. To serve as “official advisor” to the Director of National Intelligence on the matter, the existing Public Interest Declassification Board would be provided with specially-tailored funding and staff.To deal with “overclassification,” there would be a so-called “tax” on classifying too much by agencies. The penalty would come out of a working capital fund financing declassifying programs.To sum it up, the legislation introduced on Wednesday specifically includes:A 25-year time limit on classifying government records as secret or top secret.Financial incentives to discourage agencies from classifying too many records annually.Training for agency staff on classification.Enhanced centralized governance over classification of docsBoosting insider threat programs.Antiquated Technology
The “byzantine, bizarre bureaucratic system that has not kept up with the times, has not moved to digitalization” was slammed by Warner as one of the reasons for overclassification. Documents were described as piling up long after they had failed to meet the requirements for classification, records getting lost, because even in 2023, they need to be printed out. In line with the Sensible Classification Act, agencies would be mandated to use a single “federated and integrated IT solution” to handle issues of classification and declassification."We've got to invest in technological modernization, and somebody in this whole labyrinth of agencies has to make sure these changes get made across the federal government," Warner stated.
“This is a piece of legislation that can become law, and it’s desperately needed,” Jerry Moran said.
